Reader Wei used the website’s “Contact Me” on 2023-3-21 to inquire:
"Hello professor, I have always read your website and books, and I have benefited a lot and can distinguish the correctness of the messages. However, I got to know my favorite coffee and iron, and I saw the article It's a little bit. I would like to ask the professor's correctness of this article. Is this a credible journal published? Can the cell research in the statement be summarized above as it may be beneficial for human inflammation? Thank you, your information is particularly important for this generation that has been left over! ” The link aboveopens the link above "Study Certificate" published on "Taiwan News Network" on 2023-2-9! To boost your spirits and prevent stupidity, you should drink it." Its first paragraph is: "Black coffee (American coffee) is a powerful tool for office workers to maintain their attention and boost their spirits. It has been previously proven to have health benefits by many studies. In fact, will the health benefits of adding milk be more significant than black coffee? Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry published a paper that coffee products with milk, or relatively simple black coffee, have a "anti-inflammatory" effect. '
What makes me feel sorry for is that since it is "in fact", why would "health benefits be more significant than black coffee" ask? Also, since it is "research proven", why do we say "or perhaps relatively simple black coffee has more "anti-inflammatory" effects"?
Above the next second paragraph, there is a blue title: "Drinking iron is healthier than American style? Research: Coffee + milk has doubled its anti-inflammatory effect."
Then, since it is "factual" and "research and evidence", why do you have to ask yourself a question?
No matter what, let's look at the second paragraph: "This research was initiated by the Denmark University Research Team. To understand the anti-inflammatory effects of the combination of "polyphenols" and "amino acids", researchers inject anti-inflammatory factors into human immune cells. The immune cells of the first experiment group contain polyphenols that react with amino acids; the second experiment group is polyphenols that do not react with amino acids, and the immune cells of the control group do not contain any polyphenols or amino acids. '
"The study" refers to the Phenolic Acid-Amino Acid Adds Exert Distinct Immunomodulatory Effects in Macrophages Compared to Parent Phenolic Acids (compared with orthophenolic acid, phenolic acid-amino acid adducts exert unique immunomodulatory effects in macrophage cells).
This study was completely conducted with cultivated cells for practical experiments, and the human test was still a 100,000-8,000 miles away. The number of this cultured cell is RAW 264.7, and it is derived from the macrophage (macrophage cells) from mice. Please see RAW 264.7.
Then, why does "Taiwan News" call it "the immune cell of the human body"? Moreover, it is also called "injection"!
It’s just that putting the experimental chemicals into the culture solution of the cells is called “injection”! ?
Doesn't drink a sip of water also called "injection"! ?
The article "Taiwan News Network" is near the end and said, "according to the information published by the American medical media WebMD, …"
In fact, WebMD also published an article about this research, and the title is Coffee With Milk May Fight Inflammation, Preliminary Research Shows (preliminary research shows that coffee with milk may be anti-inflammatory).
Have you seen Previous Research (Preliminary Research), and May (or maybe).
This is a big difference between "research evidence: taking iron doubles the effect of anti-inflammatory in the American style! To boost your spirit and prevent stupidity, drink it."
Original text: Use iron to double the anti-inflammatory effect of American style! Taiwan Video NonsenseEditor: Gu Zihuan